Dye broadening effect (Хант. Трудности)

Статус
Закрыто для дальнейших ответов.

Alexey Shadrin

Участник
Топикстартер
Сообщения
9 258
Реакции
1 188
Коллеги, правильно ли я понимаю, что словосочетание "dye broadening effect", звучащее в таком контексте:

"A more comprehensive way of showing the complete gamut is to show the range of chromaticities attainable at various luminances relative to that of a reference white. This has been done by Ohta who has studied the effects of the sizes and widths of the main absorption bands of the dyes as well as those of the unwanted absorptions (Ohta, 1971d, 1972a). For transparencies, he concluded that the peak absorptions should be between 640 and 660 nm for cyans, between 530 and 540 nm for magentas, and at about 430 nm for yellows. The gamut was more sensitive to the position of the magenta peak than to the positions of the cyan and yellow peaks (Ohta, 1971a, 1971b). For reflection prints he showed that the gamut is smaller than that for transparencies using the same dyes, because of the dye broadening effect caused by inter-reflections in the layer (illustrated in Fig. 13.3) and because of white light reflected from the surface of the print (Ohta, 1971c and 1972b)."

означает "эффект оптического растискивания красителя"?
Спасибо.
 
Ответ: Dye broadening effect (Хант. Трудности)

Не уверен, что еще актуально, но как версия:
"эффект дрейфа красителей обусловлен..."

С большим уважением и внимательно вчитываясь,
Виталий Кудряков.
 
Статус
Закрыто для дальнейших ответов.